Showing posts with label Understanding. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Understanding. Show all posts

Saturday, December 1, 2012

Negotiation - Understanding Movement, Concessions And Bargaining

Asking questions and listening effectively are important skills both in selling and
negotiating. The first phase of negotiation involves both parties agreeing the
background to the negotiation and fishing for the opening demand or offer.

It is often better to present the opening demand or offer in terms of a hypothetical
question, as this allows the negotiator to retreat to his initial position if necessary.

The opening offer will probably be at or just about the level of the negotiator's
maximum expectation, giving him room to manoeuvre, but not so high that the offer
lacks credibility. Do not attempt to win. at this stage, but hold sufficient back so that
you are able to move, if necessary, at a later stage.

Negotiation - Understanding Movement, Concessions And Bargaining

This is a difficult period in the negotiation process and a professional negotiator will
often use silence or other pressure techniques to solicit information from the other
party.

Further Movement and Concessions:

During negotiations, it can be in the interest of each side to keep asking questions
and raising objections. Many excellent negotiators are low reactors who will proceed
very slowly. However, given that the opening position of each party differs, then there has to be movement and concessions if a deal is to be struck.

Negotiators will tend, at first, to discuss extra demands, trying to get the other side
to agree to these without offering anything in return. They will be reluctant to give
information or will defer decisions in order to increase the pressure on the other
person.

When an offer does come, it will often be on the basis of a quotation based on the
minimum quantity at the lowest possible price. In all this, the negotiator is
attempting to dominate the interview, pressing for maximum advantage, and trying
to force the other person to concede on a major issue.

The skilled negotiator will ask the other side for a complete list of all his, or her
requirements, and will not concede on a single issue until he knows the nature of
the whole package. He will then begin to trade concessions, starting with the
smaller, less important aspects of the package.

Negotiators should avoid making one-sided concessions which will severely weaken
their final position and could affect the overall profitability of the deal.

When movement comes, it begins slowly, and then can be very rapid as both parties
sense a deal is on the cards. Movement does tend to be discontinuous with
either party moving and the other holding up the agreement at any one time. This
leads to short periods of deadlock, which can be brought to an end in different
ways.

Some of these are:

o Period of silence. Wait for the other party to speak.

o Agree to a concession. Always trade concessions by saying"If I do this, will you do that"?

o Adjournment to review positions.

o Agree to leave certain issues to one side for later and concentrate on the rest.

Identify areas of common agreement.

o The use of the relationship with the other side to break the deadlock.

Signals to be aware of that could mean the other side wishes movement to take
place could include:

o Trial movement. One side uses words like "What would you say if ...?"
or uses hypothetical examples.

o Summarises the position to date and asks "Where do we go from here?"

o One side calls for adjournment.

o Appeals to the other side's better nature.

o Asks for more information.

o Uses "crowding" techniques to force movement, e.g. aggressive behaviour, sets
deadlines and time limits, threatens use of the competition.

The use of concessions is a vital part of building a profitable relationship for both
parties in the negotiation. Earlier, we discussed the different elements that could
constitute the final deal. The use of concessions enables negotiators to build a
mutually profitable deal that is not one-sided in the other side's favour i.e. It results in a "win-win" outcome.

And Finally - Bargaining:

When it comes to bargaining try to get the other side to commit themselves first. For
example:

Scenario 1.

Buyer: "I'm willing to reach some sort of deal, but I want a 10% discount".

Salesperson: "Okay, I'll agree a 10% discount, but we'll have to look at a
longer-term agreement".

Buyer: "Well, thanks for the 10% but the 1 year contract we have already
agreed will have to stand".

Scenario 2.

Buyer: "I'm willing to reach some sort of deal, but I want a 10% discount".

Salesperson: "Okay, we may be able to look at our discount structure, but to
do that we'll need to agree a 2 year contract".

Buyer: "Okay, well 2 years may be possible, but can we go to the full 10%?"

In the first scenario an offer of 10% was made, but what was asked for was vague.
Responding to a specific demand like this we need to be vague, but positive: "Okay, we may be able to look at our discount structure". and our counter demand needs to be specific: "But to do that we'll need to agree a 2 year contract"

Remember, when you bargain, offer vague, ask specific.

Copyright © 2007 Jonathan Farrington. All rights reserved

Negotiation - Understanding Movement, Concessions And Bargaining
Check For The New Release in Health, Fitness & Dieting Category of Books NOW!
Check What Are The Top Cooking Books in Last 90 Days Best Cheap Deal!
Check For Cookbooks Best Sellers 2012 Discount OFFER!
Check for Top 100 Most Popular Books People Are Buying Daily Price Update!
Check For 100 New Release & BestSeller Books For Your Collection

To find out more about the author or to subscribe to his newsletter for dedicated business professionals, visit: http://www.jonathanfarrington.com

You can also read his highly informative and popular weekly blog at: http://www.thejfblogit.co.uk

watches cell phone Best Price Slate Border Clock With Temperature And

Friday, July 13, 2012

Negotiation - Understanding Your Sources Of Power

One of the main differences between negotiators is how confident they feel when
negotiating. Typically, the more confident we feel, and the better we are prepared,
the more successful will be the outcome of our negotiations.

Personal power comes from many sources. To build up and increase our confidence
as negotiators we need to step back and analyse the sources of our personal power
and compare them with those of the people with whom we are negotiating.

Negotiation

Power is not absolute. In most negotiating relationships the power balance moves
with time as the negotiation progresses.

Negotiation - Understanding Your Sources Of Power

Here are just a few examples of sources of power:

Information Power:

Information power comes from having knowledge that will influence the outcome of
the negotiation. Planning and research can increase our information power, as can
asking the right questions before we reach the bargaining phase of the negotiation.

Reward Power:

Reward power comes from having the ability to reward the other party in the
negotiation. It could be the power a buyer has to place an order for goods and
services or the power a salesperson has to give good service and solve problems

Coercive Power:

Coercive power is the power to punish. This is seen most commonly in the buyer-
seller relationship, but can be a feature of other types of negotiation.

Situation Power:

Situation power is the power that comes from being in the right place at the right
time. A customer is desperate to place an order and you are the only source of
supply in the short term. Having an effective network and keeping in touch with
what is happening can increase your situation power.

Expertise Power:

Expertise power comes from having a particular skill which you can apply and which
can influence the outcome of the negotiation. Improving negotiation skills helps you
win better deals. Other areas of expertise could also help the outcome of the
negotiation.

And Finally - Referent Power:

Referent power comes from being consistent over time. If people see you as having a clear, consistent strategy as a negotiator, you will increase your referent power.
Having standards that you stick to and being consistent will help to increase your
referent power. In the eighties, Margaret Thatcher wasn't universally popular, but
was respected by many for being consistent in her views and behaviour. In the end
she failed because her approach was too rigid and she was unable to adapt to
changing circumstances.

Copyright © 2007 Jonathan Farrington. All rights reserved

Negotiation - Understanding Your Sources Of Power

Jonathan Farrington is the Managing Partner of The jfa Group. To find out more about the author, subscribe to his newsletter for dedicated business professionals or to read his weekly blog, visit: http://www.jonathanfarrington.com

watches cell phone Buy Cheap Denso 950 0152 Fuel Pump For Buy Best Quoizel Ok8604Ho Oakland 7 1 2 Buy New New Alkaline Battery D Case Pack